Social structures in different cultures Essay Example for Free

Social structures in contrasting horticultures EssayThe best way to study societal classes and the diversity of such in a culture would be to begin by defining what kindly class is. In order to make a more(prenominal) accurate study, it was unwrap of my method to interview some unrivalled with actual exposure to this type of social strata. I believe that on interviewing him, a genuinely true-to-life and accurate first-hand observation may be given. As, he was an Ar workforceian, I place this culture as my basis and standard. Now, to begin would be to define what social class is. His best definition would be a musical interval of sight based on the keep down of cash a family holds. This would then dictate their classification and status in society. The amount of money they would maintain as a clan would serve as a basis for their status and how they be primed(p) by the general public.Basic all in ally, the great amount of wealth possessed by a family garnered from t heir business and labor, the higher(prenominal) their status in society and in the social strata. The only exception to this would be those involved in the mafia or similar shady dealing, whereas the source of money is questionably from jobs of ill-re arrangee. These would then fetch the family sort out as being part of corrupt politics, and may give the family a bad name scorn the amount of wealth.In the culture under study, I saw the classification was basically between the sorry and sufficient. There was a wide separation between these two, as middle class was small in quantity. It is a widespread phenomenon and a social stratum that is of general knowledge throughout the country. Families that are part of the rich may be those that own homes and have adequate sources of water and facility. They would be the ones who would wear more clothes, be seen to carry themselves with more class, and in fact those who would be the ones who hire people from the trim classes as their servants or employees.Those who are not, namely the sorry, would be those in the more congested areas and towns, where luxuries such as heated water are not within access. They would be the general masses and rabble who personify day to day just trying to make a living and undertake by. Because of the wide separation between rich and suffering, there is few middle class. The distinction between the strata is unvarnished. Either one is among the divide who are born into comfort and of that more comfortable environment, or one is born into the rough real world where the grind of everyday life involves effort, blood, sweat and tears.The difficulty with the social class system is that it is an evident source of injustice and inequality amongst the people. For example, when you nark in trouble with the police, rich people always get off after they pay the police through bribery/ On the other hand, silly people go to jail.The fact that the rich have more wealth, most especially d ue to their separation from the slimy by a wide margin, gives them the antecedent to roam freely with more privilege and leniency to winding rules set by the government.They have the power to live above the law and move things to their advantage because of the money that they possess. It is also within their reach to be treated with a double standard, where the poor may be treated as usually guilty and less trusted, while the rich get off the hook. The rich are the ones more likely to be driving cars however they will not be fined for overspeeding and the like. The poor however may not be committing the crime but will be under greater suspect, because of the fact that they are poor.There are also other disadvantages to this system. The poor stay poor and get poorer. The rich stay amongst themselves and stay rich. There is a vast separation and no room for acquire better. The lack of education be the same and there is no room for growth. As the wealth stays within the rich, it i s very hard for the poor to elevate themselves to a higher standard, and by virtue of their deport into the poor, they stay poor. It is only the rich who have benefits and stay within them.This was again reiterated during my interview. The interviewee being of the richer strata stated that because he was from a wealthier community, he and all those with him knew that they would remain wealthy. Also, by living in a wealthy area, they had a clean and beautiful location, which was patrolled by police for top security, among a multitude of other benefits.The division spreads all over the place as another example of its effect is its extent to the workplace. The rich people have better jobs in business regardless of their level of education because its who they know not what they know and the poor work in factories or do not work at all.In ground of schooling, everyone is allowed equal opportunity to schooling. However, again because of the amount of resources, only the rich kids can c ontinue to learn in college so poor kids are stuck with high school level educations. The rich are college educated and the poor are high school educated, that is, if they stay in school in the first place. Because however they are on the streets, the poor have better skills rather than knowledge.Now recently, a change is staring to come across with more scholarships given out to poorer children.However, this can only do so much. As there is a widespread division between the rich and poor, the amount of uneducated folk is widespread and the access that the poor have to a chance of uplifting their standard is small. The educational system although provided for all still is one that is founded on financial capability, hence still catering mostly to keep the higher standard of the rich, and retentiveness inaccessible to the poor.In terms of politics, it is the same. Its not what you know its who you know in Armenian politics. Even though a democratic voting system is in place, there still is as well much corruption where the lower classes voice is not heard. The rich have money and money defines the power that they have, Due to the fact that they have money, they can steer the economy in a way that their opinions are more listened to and theirs are followed more. Plus, due to the fact that it is they who are more educated, they are able to use this to their advantage.The address here is not only that they have more control. It is also the fact that due to their control, they can put hindrance to the countrys growth, as instead of allocating wealth and decision to the growth of the poor, the enlargement of the middle class, the lessening of the poor, their effort are maintained on keeping the rich with the rich. The economy is on a standstill and there is no progress.The only exception to all these divisions would be that of religion. As believed, all men are equal in Gods eyes, and here there are no biases. on a lower floor the eyes of their God, all men, ric h or poor, are alike and are his children.