The U.K Identity Cards Bill and its implcations Essay

The U.K Identity Cards note and its implcations - Essay mannequin spell the Bill and the stated objectives seem reasonable, and a large majority of the general public remember it to be good idea, there remains confusion and apprehension on the potential implications of the Bill to their secrecy and civil liberties, not to mention the cost and policy implications.3 Unlike other means of soul identification, the proposed theatrical role of biometric technologies utilising biological information, and the introduction of a computerised National Identity Register, which permits users to track anybody, anytime, anywhere, in the modern networked society, app atomic number 18ntly hand over far-reaching implications on the privacy and security of the individual, as well as the society. A research is deemed necessary to infer the implications of the Bill including that of the technology involved, in terms of the privacy and security concerns, as well as to ascertain at alternative tec hniques or modes of identification, which may be considered by the government for successful implementation of the identicalness project.Researchers observe that biometric techniques, such as fingerprint verification, retina analysis, iris or face recognition, voice recognition, hand-written signature verification, are increasingly used in individual authentication and identification systems.4 While researchers are generally in agreement on the efficacy of the technology, experts in information technology and data security caution the hazard of errors including false matches and multiple identities, and the dangers of manipulations and misuse.5 Many researchers, both in the U.K and elsewhere, have studied the impact of biometric technologies on individual privacy and security.6 Researchers like Zorkadis and Donos observe that, excessively wide utilisation of biometrics creates general concern for the resistance of the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals.7 harmonise t o them any human physiological or behavioural traits used in biometric technologies are personal data protected by privacy protection legislation. The U.K. Identity Cards Bill and the use of biometrics have received widespread criticism by policy analysts and academic researchers.8 The communicate by Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) raises a number of concerns relating to the human rights compatibility of the Bill9. According to academics from the London School of Economics and Political Science the identity card bill proposals are too complex, technically unsafe, overly prescriptive and lack a foundation of public trust and confidence.10 While the researchers support the concept of a national identity system for the UK, it considers the present legislation and the scheme as a potential danger to the public interest and to the legal rights of individuals.11 Other policy analysts likewise condemn the Bill as an unwarranted state intervention in individual freedom and privacy- Dolan e. e. cummings states that the ID card proposals are in effect trying to reconstitute the public as membership presidency 12 creating a society in which the members have to constantly prove their identity to