Censorship Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

security re determine - Essay ExampleThere has always been a conflict regarding this issue as many people argue for and against drawing a protocol of guidelines on what can be tell on the mass media. From the beginning of civilization, censorship has been used by groups as well as individuals to go on and control artistic creations, information and ideas. The main causes of censorship be religion, politics and sex related issues. Censorship is particularly dominant in libraries, especially school libraries. The relationship between the libraries and censorship has always been tumultuous. The ban of certain ideas, thoughts and information in libraries as well as media is unconstitutional as the First Amendment guarantees granting immunity of speech and of the press. No individual or groups should forbid anyone from accessing information. As such, censorship should not be do in libraries as it restricts access to literature and is unconstitutional to limit the intellectual freed om of knowledge. Censorship is prideful and it hampers to the growth of literature. It is unjustifiable for libraries to limit the access to knowledge and dictate what is right and wrong in the full treatment of literature. Censorship also undermines the faith of the intelligence of the readers and at the same time oppresses free thinking. It not save obstructs the growth of literature but also, the development of creativity in students. There atomic number 18 also many rationalizations that are used by people in favor of censorship in libraries. One of the parking lot arguments in favor of censorship is that the information or a piece of literature which are deemed as dangerous or misleading by the standard of authorities must be suppressed as they can corrupt the youth. People who are in favor of censorship are also of the view that students should not be subjected to controversial issues in literature as these may lead them astray. Censorships are also solely motivated by m orality and the belief that exposure to violence in literature causes students to yield in a destructive ways. exclusively these arguments do make sense. However, in reality this is an attempt to move students inside a bubble where they are protected from the issues of the outside world. There is no evidence to elicit that fictional violence causes students to be become violent or that students who are exposed to violence in literature are prone to act violently. If literature is censored solely on the base of the actions of dubious people, no work of literature or art can survive. Many works of literature are banned in schools in the 90s Of Mice and Men, Catcher in the Rye, The grapes of Wrath, Lord of the Flies etc are some examples. All these books are award winning classics and amazing literature in their own rights, which have the ability to cast people positively. Most frequently, books are censored by school libraries as they contain violence, sex, homosexuality and in tractable children. Behind textbook controversies, are beliefs and values that encompass more than curriculum decision in schoolroom (June 1). But, the real question is why should students be prohibited from reading books which have lesbians as the main grapheme or about gay couples? It is not that students are not aware of such issues and the reality is that the libraries are just dictating a norm of regulated rules as to how an individual should behave in society. The libraries are playing as