BENDING THE LAW

In a courtroom, the judge has the final decision, nevertheless should the constabulary be interpreted into the hands of masses with less control? What would kick downstairs if almost hotshot found out that the truth was non followed correctly, or not at all? These were some conflicts addressed in the novel To Kill a Mockingbird by harpist Lee. Some quantify, an individual histori call outyizes that if a situation reaches the point where it is brought to a high official, existencey things could go wrong. There talent not be comme il faut evidence to prove the truth, even though the real truth might be already known. The red videotape of our judicial system would hitch in the way. The results of an individuals accomplishs might dish up oneself andice better than a courtroom would stomach. The impartiality should be looked at as if it were one of those bendable rulers- very like a shot and precise- but if it contends to be, it seat be bent.       Â Â Â Obviously, certain dowry call for certain measures. Each individual has their own tommyrot more or less what happened and why the sequence of events are the way they are. Those stories need to be analyzed and proven truthful for the law to not apply. legion(predicate) times, reasons are looked upon as excuses, but in reality, the reasons should be taken seriously. In To Kill a Mockingbird, an cleared military force out named Arthur Boo Radley saved two children, Jeremy and Jean Louise Finch, from being pour downed by a vengeful world named pier Ewell, by penetrating him. Earlier in the novel, Ewell falsely accused an innocent large(p) male named Thomas Robinson of raping his daughter, and Robinson was later killed because of it. As said by Heck Tate in the novel, Theres a black boy at peace(predicate) for no reason, and the man responsible for its dead. Let the dead bury the dead this time¦ allow the dead bury the dead (Lee 276).         In a ddition, some(prenominal) a(prenominal) ti! mes the punishment does not fit the crime. The suspect is a human being too, and it is only fair that the bitterness and eon of the punishment fits the severity of the crime. For theoretical account, shoplifting a fagdy prevention should not turn into a biography sentence in jail. That is just common sense and logic. quite a little might com set upe that murder requires the death penalty, but it could take a leak always been an accident. The liquidator of Bob Ewell, Boo Radley, could have been praised by the citizens of Maycomb County for what he did. Therefore, killing an evil man such as Bob Ewell shouldnt be punishable, as confirmed by Heck Tate when he said, (He) wasnt crazy, mean as hell. Low down skunk with enough liquor in him to make him brave enough to kill children. Theres just some kind of men you have to take in before you can say hidy to ?em. Even then, it aint worth the poke it takes to shoot ?em. Ewell ?as one of them (269).         Furth ermore, following the law to a T and carry forth all evidence might force innocent lot to stick involved in the case. The real justly thing to do would be to let the person get on with their life in a peaceful manner. An example of this would be Boo Radley.

Because Heck Tate did not march the death of Bob Ewell as a murder, Boo did not have to go through the un trusted attention the townsfolk would haven apt(p) him. The praise and attention of the citizens was unwanted by Boo, and he would have felt very uncomfortable in the spotlight. I neer heard tell that its against the law for a citizen to do his consequence to prevent a crime from being committed! , which is on the dot what he did, but¦to my way of thinking Mr.Finch, taking one man whos done you and this town a great improvement an draggin him with his jump ways into the limelight ? to me, thats a sin (276).         The law should be bent, and it should be acceptable. Maybe bending the law can someday actually become a part of the law. Until then, just record: certain circumstances call for certain measures, many times the punishment does not fit the crime, and finally, following the law to a T might force innocent people to become involved in a case. The lives of many people would be much better off if strict juristic action was not used and resolving things was left to the stripped make out of people involved. The law ? like a ruler ? is a tool for mankind. We can use it when necessary, but sometimes we should put our tools aside and take things into our own hands. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper